Program evaluation
'''Program evaluation''' is essentially a set of philosophies and techniques to determine if a program works. It is a practice field that has emerged, particularly in the USA, as a disciplined way of assessing the merit, value, and worth of projects and programs. Evaluation became particularly relevant in the 1960s during the period of the Great Society social programs associated with the Kennedy and Johnson administrations. Extraordinary sums were invested in social programs, but the means of knowing what happened, and why were not available. Behind the seemingly simple question of whether the program works are a host of other more complex questions. For example, the first question is, what is a program supposed to do? It is often difficult to define what a program is supposed to do, so indirect indicators may be used instead. For example schools are supposed to educate people. But what does educate mean? Give knowledge? Teach how to think? Give specific skills? If the exact goal cannot be defined well, it is difficult to indicate whether the program works. Another question about programs is, what else do they do? There may be unintended or unforeseen consequences of a program. Some consequences may be positive and some may be negative. These unintended consequences may be as important as the intended consequences. So evaluations should measure not just whether the program does what it should be doing, but what else it may be doing. Perhaps the most difficult part of evaluation is determining whether it is the program itself that is doing something. There may be other events or processes that are really causing the outcome, or preventing the hoped for outcome. However, due to the nature of the program, many evaluations cannot determine whether it is the program itself, or something else, is the cause. One main reason that evaluations cannot determine causation involves self selection. That is, people select themselves to participate in a program. For example, in a jobs training program, some people decide to participate, and others, for whatever reason, do not participate. It may be that those who do participate are those who are most determined to find a job, or who have the best support resources, thus allowing them to participate and allowing them to find a job. The people who participate are somehow different from those who don't participate, and it may be the difference, not the program, that leads to a successful outcome for the participants, that is, finding a job. If programs could, somehow, use random selection, then they could determine causation. That is, if a program could randomly assign people to participate or to not participate in the program, then, theoretically, the group of people who participate would be the same as the group who did not participate, and an evaluation could rule out other causes. However, since most programs cannot use random assignment, causation cannot be determined. Evaluations can still provide useful information. For example, the outcomes of the program can be described. Thus the evaluation can say something like, "People who participate in program xyz were more likely to find a job, while people who did not participate were less likely to find a job." If the program is fairly large, and there are many participants, and there is enough data, statistical analysis can be used sometimes to make a reasonable case for the program by showing, for example, that other causes are unlikely. Another approach is to use the evaluation to analyze the program process. So instead of focusing on the outcome (for example, did people in a jobs training program get jobs), the evaluation would focus on what the program was doing. For example, did people seem to learn the skills being taught? Did people stay in the program or did they drop out part way through? Were the teachers teaching appropriate skills? And so forth. This information could help how the program was operating. People who do program evaluation can come from many different backgrounds, such as sociology, psychology, economics, social work or many other areas. Some graduate schools also have specific training programs for program evaluation. Program evaluations can involve quantitative methods of social research or qualitative methods or both.
See also
- Important publications in program evaluation
External links
- American Evaluation Association Includes a link to Evaluation resources such as organizations, links sites, email discussion lists, consultants and more.
- Resources for Methods in Evaluation and Social Research links to free resources used for methods of evaluation.
rogram evaluation
Pogram evaluation
Prgram evaluation
Proram evaluation
Progam evaluation
Progrm evaluation
Progra evaluation
Programevaluation
Program valuation
Program ealuation
Program evluation
Program evauation
Program evalation
Program evalution
Program evaluaion
Program evaluaton
Program evaluatin
Program evaluatio
rPogram evaluation
Porgram evaluation
Prgoram evaluation
Prorgam evaluation
Progarm evaluation
Progrma evaluation
Progra mevaluation
Programe valuation
Program vealuation
Program eavluation
Program evlauation
Program evaulation
Program evalaution
Program evalutaion
Program evaluaiton
Program evaluatoin
Program evaluatino
Program evaluatio
PProgram evaluation
Prrogram evaluation
Proogram evaluation
Proggram evaluation
Progrram evaluation
Prograam evaluation
Programm evaluation
Program evaluation
Program eevaluation
Program evvaluation
Program evaaluation
Program evalluation
Program evaluuation
Program evaluaation
Program evaluattion
Program evaluatiion
Program evaluatioon
Program evaluationn
rogram evaluation
pogram evaluation
prgram evaluation
proram evaluation
progam evaluation
progrm evaluation
progra evaluation
programevaluation
program valuation
program ealuation
program evluation
program evauation
program evalation
program evalution
program evaluaion
program evaluaton
program evaluatin
program evaluatio
rpogram evaluation
porgram evaluation
prgoram evaluation
prorgam evaluation
progarm evaluation
progrma evaluation
progra mevaluation
programe valuation
program vealuation
program eavluation
program evlauation
program evaulation
program evalaution
program evalutaion
program evaluaiton
program evaluatoin
program evaluatino
program evaluatio
pprogram evaluation
prrogram evaluation
proogram evaluation
proggram evaluation
progrram evaluation
prograam evaluation
programm evaluation
program evaluation
program eevaluation
program evvaluation
program evaaluation
program evalluation
program evaluuation
program evaluaation
program evaluattion
program evaluatiion
program evaluatioon
program evaluationn